Is your website actually easy to use?
Aperion's Usability AI agent evaluates every page for navigation clarity, cognitive load, mobile interaction patterns, and UX best practices - then gives you a prioritised list of improvements that reduce friction and keep users engaged.
Checks navigation · cognitive load · mobile UX · interaction patterns · information architecture · error prevention
The cost of poor usability
Bad UX drives users away silently
High abandonment
88% of users won't return after a bad experience
First impressions are permanent. Confusing navigation, unclear information architecture, or overwhelming interfaces send visitors to competitors - and they rarely come back.
Mobile friction
60% of web traffic is mobile - but mobile UX lags
Most websites are designed desktop-first. Mobile users encounter smaller tap targets, hard-to-read text, confusing gestures, and layouts that break on smaller screens.
Cognitive overload
Too many choices reduce conversions by 30%
The paradox of choice is real. Too many navigation options, competing CTAs, and cluttered pages overwhelm visitors into inaction. Simplicity is a conversion strategy.
Support cost
Poor usability drives 22% of support tickets
When users can't find what they need or complete tasks independently, they contact support. Usability issues have a direct cost in support time and brand friction.
Setup
Usability insights in 3 steps
No user testing sessions. No expensive UX audits. No waiting weeks for results.
Add your URL
Aperion captures screenshots and analyses the full structure of every page - navigation, content hierarchy, interactive elements, and layout.
AI evaluates UX patterns
Every page assessed against established usability heuristics: clarity, consistency, feedback, error prevention, efficiency, and flexibility.
Get your usability improvement plan
Issues ranked by user impact. Know exactly which navigation problems, mobile issues, or cognitive load factors to fix first.
Usability Analysis Coverage
Every interaction. Every page.
Aperion's Usability AI agent evaluates pages across four key dimensions - navigation structure, cognitive demand, mobile experience, and interaction quality. Each dimension maps to real user behaviour and measurable conversion outcomes.
10
UX heuristics
Mobile
Usability checks
Nav
Analysis
- Primary navigation clarity
- Breadcrumb presence
- Search functionality
- Menu depth (max 3 levels)
- Link labelling
- 404 handling
- Site structure logical flow
- Content density
- Competing visual elements
- Heading hierarchy
- Whitespace usage
- Form complexity
- Reading level alignment
- Choice overload detection
- Touch target sizes (min 44×44px)
- Viewport configuration
- Font size legibility (min 16px body)
- Horizontal scrolling detection
- Mobile-specific interaction patterns
- Thumb zone usage
- Error messages
- Loading state indicators
- Success confirmations
- Hover states
- Focus indicators
- Disabled state clarity
- Micro-interaction quality
Audit output
See exactly what an Aperion usability audit looks like
Structured reports with every UX dimension scored, mobile issues listed, and prioritised fix instructions.
Usability summary
This page has 14 heuristic violations across navigation depth, cognitive load, and mobile usability. Three critical issues are driving significant user drop-off.
61
Usability score
14
Violations
3
Critical issues
{
"usability_score": 61,
"heuristic_violations": 14,
"critical": 3,
"mobile_issues": 7,
"navigation_score": 58,
"cognitive_load": "high"
}
Cognitive load assessment
High content density, 5 competing CTAs, and a Grade 15 reading level are overwhelming users before they can act.
{
"content_density": "high",
"competing_ctas": 5,
"reading_level": "Grade 15",
"whitespace_score": 32,
"heading_hierarchy": "inconsistent"
}
Mobile usability
11 touch targets are below the 44×44px minimum. Horizontal scrolling is present. This page will frustrate mobile users significantly.
Critical mobile issue
Horizontal scroll detected - content extends beyond viewport on mobile screens
{
"touch_targets_failing": 11,
"min_touch_target": "28x28px (too small)",
"viewport_configured": true,
"horizontal_scroll": true,
"font_size_issues": 4
}
Prioritised fix instructions
Every usability issue includes a plain-English fix description, effort estimate, and expected score improvement so you can prioritise effectively.
Estimated score gain
+12 points
From top fix alone · medium effort
{
"top_fix": "Reduce navigation depth
from 4 to 3 levels and
add breadcrumbs",
"score_gain": 12,
"effort": "medium"
}
Frequently asked questions
- Aperion's Usability AI agent checks navigation clarity, information architecture, cognitive load, mobile usability, interaction patterns, and error prevention. It evaluates pages against established usability heuristics including Nielsen's 10 principles, covering everything from menu depth and tap target sizes to content density and form complexity.
- Accessibility focuses on whether people with disabilities can use your website at all - screen readers, keyboard navigation, contrast ratios. Usability focuses on how easy and efficient your website is for all users - clarity, cognitive load, navigation logic, and interaction patterns. Both matter, but they address different failure modes.
- Cognitive load refers to the mental effort required to use your website. High cognitive load - caused by cluttered layouts, competing CTAs, inconsistent navigation, or dense text - forces users to think too hard. Research shows that reducing cognitive load directly improves completion rates, time-on-task, and conversion rates.
- Mobile users account for over 60% of web traffic, but mobile conversion rates are typically 3x lower than desktop. The primary cause is poor mobile UX - tap targets that are too small, text that requires zooming, layouts that don't adapt, and gestures that don't work as expected. Fixing mobile usability issues is one of the highest-ROI improvements available.
- Yes. Aperion's Usability AI agent analyses full-page screenshots and HTML to evaluate UX patterns, navigation structure, content hierarchy, and mobile layout. It applies established usability heuristics to identify friction points that would require expensive user testing to find manually. While user testing remains the gold standard, AI analysis provides fast, scalable usability feedback at a fraction of the cost.
- Usability regressions are introduced whenever navigation is changed, new content is added, or layouts are updated. Aperion supports scheduled monitoring so you are notified when a change degrades the usability of a page. This is especially important for e-commerce sites and SaaS products where checkout and onboarding flows are frequently modified.
Start improving your website's usability
Join the waitlist for early access. Find out exactly where your website is losing users.
No credit card required. Start with 3 pages free.